Turkish teachers and schools in the eyes of refugee students
Keywords:political socialisation, political participation, voting behaviour, brain drain, high-skilled Turkish migrants
This study aimed to reveal how refugee students think about their Turkish teachers and schools through art. This study was done using an art based research method, proposed as a way of analysis by Mullen (2003) and Huss and Cwikel (2005). The study was carried out with 25 refugee students from two primary schools in the central city of Denizli in the 2017-2018 academic years. During the study, the students were asked to draw a picture of a teacher on one side of a paper and draw a picture of a school on another side of the paper. Later, students, who can speak Turkish, were asked to say a phrase about the school and teacher concepts. Phrases and drawings of the refugee children about the image of their teacher and school show us that these students have positive opinions about their teachers and schools.
Ahi, B., Cingi, M. A., & Kıldan, A. O. (2016). 48-60 Aylık çocukların öğretmen kavramına yönelik algılarının çizimler aracılığıyla incelenmesi. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 77-90.
Akbulut, M.G. & Saban, A. (2012). An investigation of primary school students' perceptions of violence revealed through their drawings. Turkish Journal of Education, 1(1), 21-37.
Arslan Cansever, B. (2017). The Children's Perceptions of the Teacher: An Analysis of the Drawings Created by the Children. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, l (18), 281-291. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.306625
Artut, K. (2002). Sanat Eğitimi Kuramları ve Yöntemleri. (2. Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Artut, K. (2007). Okul Öncesinde Resim Eğitimi (2.Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Aslan, K., Aslan, N., & Arslan-Cansever, B. (2012). Eğitim bilimine giriş. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Atasu, T. R. (2012). Turkiye’de gocmen cocuklarin profili, sosyal politika ve sosyal hizmet onerileri hizli değerlendirme arastirmasi. Uluslararasi Goc Orgutu (International Organization of Migration), Isvicre (Sweden).
Aykaç, N. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin resimlerinde öğretmen ve öğrenme süreci algısı. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 228-315.
Barman, C. R. (1997). Students’ views of scientists and science: results from a national study. Science and Children; 35(1), 18.
Barone, T. & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts based research, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
Barnes, E. A. (1893). A Study of children’s drawings. Pedagogical Seminary,(3), 451.Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts based research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge.
Can Yasar, M. & Aral, N. (2009). Sanat Ürünü Olarak Çocuk Resimleri. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi. 34, (365), 24-31.
Çam Aktaş, B. (2010). Investigating primary school students’ perceptions regarding ‘teacher’ through their drawings. The International Journal of Learning, 17(8), 409-425.
Cherney, I. D., Seiwert, C. S., Dickey, T. M., & Flichtbeil, J. D. (2006). Children’s drawings: a mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 127-142.
Clarke, L., Ungerer, J., Chahoud, K., Johnson, S., and Steifel, I. (2002). Attention deficit disorder is associated with attachment ınsecurity. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, 179–198.
Dogutas, A. (2018). Teachers’ Perceptions of Refugee Students in Turkish Schools, Multicultural Learning and Teaching, 4 (8), 1-8.
Dotson, M. L. (2007). Educational criticism, a form of arts-based educational research for studying teachers. Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 1, 11-20.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18 (4), 375-385.
Fury, G., Carlson, E. A. and Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Children’s representations of attachment relationships in family drawings. Child Development, 68, 1154–1164.
Greenwood, J. (2012). Arts-based research: Weaving magic and meaning. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 13 (Interlude 1). Retrieved 2014 from http://www.ijea.org/v13i1/
Gültekin, Ç., Tosun, Ö., Turgut, Ş., Örenler, Ş., Şengül, K. & Top, G. (2010). Promoting an inclusive ,mage of scientists among students: Towards research evidence-based practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education National Science Council, Online. Taiwa.
Harrison, L.J., Clarke, L. & Ungerer, J. A. (2007) Children’s drawings provide a new perspective on teacher–child relationship quality and school adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 55–71
Huss, E. & Cwikel, J. (2005). Researching Creations: Applying Arts-Based Research to Bedouin Women’s Drawings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(4), 1-16.
Kaplan, N. & Main, M. (1985). Internal representations of attachment at six years as indicated by family drawings and verbal responses to imagined separations. In M. Main (Chair), Attachment: A Move to the Level of Rrepresentation. Symposium Conducted at the Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto, Canada.
Karadağ, Ç. (2004). Görme kültürü (Görüntüler evreni). Ankara: Doruk Yayınları.
Kartal, B., & Basci, E. (2014). Turkiye’ye yonelik multeci ve siginmaci hareketleri, CBU Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 275-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.18026/cbusos.42910
Leitch, R. (2008). Creatively researching children’s narratives through images and drawings. In P. Thomson (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people, (pp. 37-59). New York: Routledge.
McNiff, S. (1998). Art-based research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.
McRobbie, A. (1999). Postmodernizm ve popüler kültür (çev. A. Özdek). İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınevi.
Milli Egitim Bakanligi 2010 MEB Yabanci Uyruklu Ogrenciler Genelgesi. Retrieved from
http://ogm.meb.gov.tr/belgeler/genelge_2010_48.pdf at 10.03.2015
Mirzoeff, N. (1998). What is the visual culture? In N. Mirzoeff (Ed.). Visaul culture reader (pp. 3-14). London and New York: Routledge.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1995). What is visual culture? In I. Lavin (Ed.), Meaning in the visual arts: Views from the outside (pp. 207-217). Princeton: Institute for Advanced Study.
Mullen, C. (2003). A self-fashioned gallery of aesthetic practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2), 165-182.
Oğuz-Ünver, A. (2010). Perceptions of scientists: a comparative study of fifth graders and fourth year student teachers. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 4(1), 11-28.
Pentassuglia, M. (2017). The Art(ist) is present”: Arts-based research perspective in educational research, Cogent Education, 4: 1301011, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301011
Pianta, R. C., Longmaid, K., & Ferguson, K. E. (1999). Attachment-based classifications of children’s family drawings: Psychometric properties and relations with children’s adjustment in kindergarten. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 244–55.
Rogoff, I. (1998). Studying visual culture. In N. Mirzoeff (Ed.), Visaulculture reader (pp.14-26). London and New York: Routledge.
Sadık, F., Çakan, H., & Artut, K. (2011). Çocuk resimlerine yansıyan çevre sorunlarının sosyo-ekonomik farklılıklara göre analizi. İlköğretim Online, 10(3), 1066-1080. Retrieved from: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
Selwyn, N., Boraschi, D. & Özkula, S.M. (2009). Drawing digital pictures: an ınvestigation of primary pupils’ representations of ıct and schools. British Educational Research Journal. 35, (6), 909–928.
Turkcan, B. (2013). Semiotic Approach to the Analysis of Children’s Drawings, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 600-607.
Türkkan (Türkcan), B. (2008). İlköğretim görsel sanatlar dersi bağlamında görsel kültür çalışmaları: bir eylem araştırması. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
Yaşar. C. M. & Aral, N. (2009). Sanat Ürünü Olarak Çocuk Resimleri. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi,34 (365), 24-31.
Yavuzer, H. (2009). Resimleriyle Çocuk. (3. Baskı). Ankara: Remzi Kitabevi.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
How to Cite
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0